This post was originally intended to be a guide for using my Differentiated Article Sets (available on TPT ^_~), but it can apply to using any texts you have at multiple reading/lexile levels.
JUMP RIGHT TO IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY
For
 those who don't know (Hey there, welcome! Hope you enjoy your time 
here.), I teach high school direct instruction English and Intensive 
Reading to students with high-incidence disabilities - primarily 
learning disabilities, language impairments, ADHD, and Autism. The 
reading skills of my students vary widely (from kindergarten-level to 
nearly grade-level), so I am constantly differentiating my instruction 
to meet their needs (or at least trying to).
One easy way to 
differentiate is to use texts that have been adapted to different levels
 of complexity. Differentiating texts allows students to engage with the
 material at a difficulty level they can be successful with, ensuring 
that all learners can develop their skills effectively.
While you 
could probably categorize your students into 10 different levels of 
reading ability (I know I can, lol), I typically group students into 
three levels. I think this is a manageable number for the teacher, and 
it typically works for creating small groups that are large enough to 
generate discussion, but small enough to provide students with practice 
opportunities and individualized support and feedback. 
FINDING TEXTS
While
 teachers have been told for decades that we need to differentiate our 
instruction, there's surprisingly few resources for differentiated 
materials at the secondary level. Most of the differentiated text sets 
I've found online or on TPT are designed for elementary, or they include
 texts at different levels that discuss a similar topic, but don't cover
 the same information. This is fine if you're doing all of your 
instruction in small groups, but that's not realistic, nor is it ideal. 
While students can do some deep learning in leveled groups, they also 
benefit from mixed-ability groups and whole group instruction.
In
 order to differentiate in those settings, you need texts about the same
 topic at different instructional levels. The best-known source for this
 in secondary (at least in my experience) is Newsela.
 Newsela provides a variety of texts including (relatively) recent 
events. You can find some really interesting topics on there, and the 
texts are offered at up to five reading levels. They also include 
comprehension questions and writing prompts. If you're never tried it, I
 suggest you check it out. They have a paid version (I'm lucky enough 
that my district provides this) and a "Freemium" version.
While I 
do use Newsela, I typically only use it in small groups. Reason being 
that when they lower the levels of their articles, they tend to remove 
information and even entire sections. They also completely change the 
questions. This is fine in small group but makes any whole group 
discussion difficult and cumbersome (which kind of defeats the point of 
everyone reading about the same topic). I also find students get 
frustrated by the length of these articles and avoid completing them 
independently.
ReadWorks
 also provides some of their texts in differentiated levels in their 
StepReads category. I haven't spent a lot of time looking through these,
 mainly because most of the texts I checked only offered one lowered 
level of the text that was still pretty high in text complexity, so it 
doesn't work for my needs. I do like that they try to keep the same text
 structure, vocabulary, and content, but I think that hinders their 
ability to differentiate widely.
In researching for this article, I came across the website For the Teachers
 which offers texts at three different reading levels. They also list 
related skills for each text which I like since I often structure my 
curriculum around targeting specific reading skills (although I couldn't
 find anywhere that they provide any actual questions for the texts). It
 looks like there could be some good materials here, but I am concerned 
about their statement "These articles are fiction, but they are written 
to be read and used as non-fiction." Given the prevalence of false 
information these days, I don't understand why they would go this route.
 I also ran into issues of broken or incorrect links which would be very
 frustrating to deal with if I was trying to get resources together for a
 unit.
If you want to check out more resources, including some for elementary and some targeted to ELLs, Larry Ferlazzo offers a comprehensive list here.
Now
 I would be remiss if I didn't mention the differentiated article sets
 I've made. I created these because I couldn't find the resources I 
needed for my students. I was looking for articles that:
- Were available at multiple reading levels
- Were about interesting topics
- Covered the same key content in each article
- Included questions that could be applied across all levels of texts
 
My
 goal was to be able to provide my students with texts that were 
targeted to their instructional level, without making the difference 
obvious to other students in the class. Even when everyone is in the 
class because they struggle with reading, they still get embarrassed 
when they are given "easier" work than their peers.
My articles 
include three versions of the text (approximately 3rd, 6th, and 9th 
grade levels), four levels of text-dependent questions (including 
multiple choice and open response), and personal response questions. 
They're pretty cheap at only $3 too. If you think you might be 
interested, you can check them out here.
IMPLEMENTATION
Alright
 so you've found your articles. Now, how do you use them? There are a 
number of different ways, but I'll outline the four I use most often 
here. But first a quick aside about learner profiles
The Importance of Learner Profiles
When
 implementing differentiated reading strategies, it is crucial to 
consider each student's unique learner profile. This means taking into 
account their abilities with all components of the reading process. With
 my students I focus mainly on decoding and comprehension. I kind of 
view it like a Punnett Square (remember those from high school?).
Based
 on this we end up with four learner profiles. If you stop here, you can
 essentially make three levels of groups: students who are weak in both 
areas, students who are weak in one area, and students who are strong in
 both areas. In this case you can simply provide each of the three 
levels with three tiers of articles and questions.
In my article sets, you can use the quick print guide to do just that!
Method 1: Independent Reading with Targeted Texts and Questions
Assign
 texts according to each student's reading level, allowing them to work 
independently. This approach gives students the opportunity to practice 
their decoding and comprehension skills at a comfortable level of 
difficulty, fostering growth and confidence in their abilities. 
Your
 goal is for each student to feel challenged and supported. You can 
assign specific texts to students, or you can allow students to choose 
which one best suits their needs, promoting self-determination.
While
 differentiated articles work great for independent skill practice, they
 can also be excellent resources for working with students in small 
groups. In fact, it was working with my small groups that first inspired
 me to find leveled texts with similar content and skill practice.
Method 2: Small Group Reading for Targeted Support
For
 classrooms with diverse reading levels, small group instruction is 
crucial. This method allows for targeted instruction and support, 
ensuring that struggling students receive the necessary scaffolding to 
develop their skills. This method not only caters to the individual 
needs of each student, but also fosters a sense of community as students
 work together towards shared learning goals.
You
 can meet with all three leveled groups, but it's okay to sometimes let 
your higher-level readers work independently, while you work with 
lower-level readers. Struggling students need more direct instruction to
 build foundational skills and to ensure they are not practicing and 
reinforcing errors.
But Tracy, you say, I want to review the 
comprehension questions with all of my students, but I don't have enough
 time to meet with them all in small groups. How can I give them 
differentiated texts to read, but still review the questions together?
Method 3: Whole Group Discussion with Targeted Texts and Unified Questions
Our
 third strategy is to provide students with differentiated texts but 
assign the same set of questions. This approach allows learners at 
different reading levels to engage with the material in a meaningful way
 while still promoting critical thinking and comprehension skills. By 
using the same question set, students can participate in discussions and
 collaborate with their peers, regardless of their individual reading 
abilities.
If
 you use this method I would suggest using Level 2 multiple choice 
questions. Use whatever will best serve the needs of your students. If 
you worry that some students will struggle with the level of questions 
you chose to use, you can try having students work in pairs, rather than
 individually. If a student has strong decoding skills but struggles 
with comprehension, try pairing them with a peer who has strong 
comprehension skills and a weakness in decoding. They can work together 
to make sense of the text, discuss their ideas, and learn from one 
another.
But what if you have a greater variety of learners in your class and still want them to be able to work independently? 
Perhaps you have a student with strong decoding skills but very weak 
comprehension. If you give them a Level 2 set, they won't be challenged 
by reading the text, and the questions may be too difficult for them to 
answer.
This is where mixing and matching comes in.
Let's take our Punnet Square and further differentiate it by adding a third level for each.
Just
 by considering three levels of two components of reading, we have nine 
different profiles. To accommodate for those differences you need a mix 
of differentiated texts 
and differentiated questions. (If you're guessing my article sets contain both, you're right!).
Method 4: Mixing and Matching
There
 is no rule that says you have to use Level 2 questions with a Level 2 
text. Mix and match articles and question sets to your hearts content. 
For example I have a student with decent comprehension skills but very 
weak writing skills (plus large handwriting!). I give him standard 
multiple choice text-dependent questions, but give him wide lined 
personal response questions.
You have to gauge your students to 
know which material is best for which student. Simple guidelines would 
be to base the text level on their decoding skills and the question 
level on their comprehension skills. From there you can fine tune as 
necessary.
Whew, that is a wall of text, 
isn't it. I didn't mean to ramble on so much but I hope you found this 
useful. Here is a brief recap:
- Using Differentiated Texts and Questions
- Four Main Methods
- Independent Reading with Targeted Texts and Questions
- Small Group Reading for Targeted Support
- Whole Group Discussion with Targeted Texts and Unified Questions
- Mixing and Matching
- Using Disorderly Teaching Differentiated Article Sets
- Articles can be used for any of the methods above
- The sets were originally designed to allow for whole group discussion
- You
 can further differentiate by having higher level students read 
independently while you read the article together with lower level 
students in a small group.
- Each article contains the same key information so that the content can be discussed in a whole group lesson.
- Levels
 are marked with a small code on the corner of the page. These codes are
 used to mask the level information so it's not as obvious to students.
 
- The codes are listed in the Table of Contents (p. 3).  
 
- The last letter of the code indicates the level.
 
- Level 1 = a
- Level 2 = b
- Level 3 = c 
 
- The question sets are all worded the same way and cover the same skills and content, but are differentiated in response type.
- Questions
 can be reviewed in whole group, but it would then become obvious that 
some students have questions presented differently from others. There is
 nothing wrong with this, but you know your students and how they would 
handle this best.
- If you think this may be an issue, you can
 give students differentiated articles but give them all the same 
question set. In this case I would suggest using either the multiple 
choice questions with 4 choices, or open response with lines. Use 
whatever will best serve the needs of your students.